dearfree

The Power Mac G5 wins handily on overall performance, with a score of 1971. That dual G4 reaches nearly 75% of that performance at 1416, indicating that a dual 2.3 GHz G5 system is nowhere near as much faster than a dual 1.0 GHz G4 Mac than processor speed would lead you to expect. This 2.3 GHz Power Mac G5 with dual processors is a very nice machine, and the fact that it runs Classic Mode is wonderful.

A Hackintosh is a non-Apple computer that runs Mac OS X. AMD USERS READ THIS: Though technically permitted, the general consensus on Hackintoshes with AMD CPUs is that they're more trouble than they're worth. We probably won't be able to help with any AMD-related issues. Aug 26, 2016  The Intel mac mini ditches the modem and instead has 4 USB ports compared to the lame amount of 2 on the G4. /best-nas-server-for-mac-2014.html. If you’re even more curious about this machine it was made in the last week of January 2005, either in China or the Czech Republic.

I've acquired my ibook Gary the gadget guy4 for nearly two decades today and it appears to end up being seriously slowing up, this could become because i lately purchased a 24' imac fully loaded and its just by assessment but we was wanting to know, i've obtained restore dvds and was wondering if i restored the ibook to first configurations and easily wiped it clear would it enhance swiftness at all? Issues like opening app'h and things just take forever. I utilized mac for a even though now but i'm not really really familiar when it arrives to formatting and that type of point any suggestions would end up being greatly valued Regards Chris.

I'michael back looking again for something to keep my outdated Mac PowerBook Gary the gadget guy4 alive and nicely. I lately came across these external backup memory sticks made by Seagate. (To substitute/expand my older 'G-Drives' of 500 GB's which are usually 'full' simply 10 Gigabyte left to fill!) Apparently I had been advised they are capable to still operate making use of the aged OSX 10.4 (Tiger) program. But I talked to the Seagate sales person who requested me to reply some queries first.so I'm right here searching for the answers if anyone knows it. The two memory sticks are usually ST DS 1000100 FOT 1TC and ST DS 2000100 2TC 2. Can the older Gambling 10.4 OS handle forces as large as 1 TB or 2 TB? Keeping in mind that they were not actually on the drawing panel when Gambling came out.

The new external memory sticks make use of USB (Not the Firewire I was using with my old external memory sticks), which can be USB 3.0 (backwards compatible ONLY to 2.0 I'michael told. Therefore will be that going to become any issue with my aged USB 1? (I wear't remember and could not find solution on 'preferences' 'program' information) 4.

I furthermore requested right here some time back on this site: Found several threads I do: rccharles replied me stating: Mar 16, 2015 11:42 Was rccharles Scar 16, 2015 11:42 Are Re also: Require a brand-new exterior HDD that still functions by Firewire under Tiger 10.4.11 in response to MacHelp I'm working a firewire 400 1-terabyte push with my iMác g3 600. Robert But I did not catch a name of the travel, today that I'meters purchasing to attempt to obtain a new HDD.can you inform me which one will be/has been recently working therefore well? And if the Seagate types you've got any knowledge with them? Thanks a lot and and that worried my queries of how to either print out out the contents of a HD or get them to evaluate each some other as there is a distinction between the two backup pushes I'll end up being moving over to the new Seagate ones. Just wish to repair that up when I obtain into new pushes as I'll also clear up the Mac pc HD so its able to practice the system faster. So the query here is certainly that I'michael told the USB's i9000 do not really enable me to daisy string them both into the Mac pc the way I can connect up two Firewire 500 Gigabyte HD't before for exchanges or evaluations of content material making use of the plan I've just not experienced the free of charge memory to use yet.

Is definitely this true? Is definitely there a function about? Why will Seagate avoid Firewire on their drives? (that is usually why I make use of either WD ór G-Drivé which perform have got Firewire ports). I'michael informed by the jeweler (once again) there is definitely a 'Thunderbolt' acéssory for USB tó that, but óf program after that there is no 'Thunderbolt' tó Firewire 400/800? On my previous Mac pc. And anything eIse I might have forgotten with trying to operate 1 TB or 2 TB HD's i9000 from a 60!!!

GB Primary HD inside the Macintosh G4 PowerBook from 2004. I wish I did not re-ask ánything that I already had answered in my lengthy threads above. Thanks for reading all my questions! Sorry I have got so numerous of them! You're saying all pushes 2.19 TB or smaller will work with my older H4? Presuming it provides the appropriate slots for your Gary the gadget guy4. Yes, as above.

These should work,even as far back again as Operating-system8.6! That a single may end up being a bit iffy would need. FW/400 can be 6 pin oblong, FW/800 can be 9 pin rectangle. I'g state the instances chipsets utilized are significantly better than what HDD Manufacturers use, the HDD used is certainly the questionOWC'beds may possess different manufacturers.

You can examine the rankings there. That disturbance is definitely with USB3 drives just. You can furthermore question on My Web site. Thanks for the quick response! And the OWC Hyperlink. (looking in wonder) I didn't know that I could simply choose any one óf these to work with my outdated G4/Tiger mixture??? I earlier delt with American Digital.ór G-Drive fór my Mac-ánd both say their contemporary style drives do not work at all with 10.4 Gambling.

So just for the record. Making particular here before I expend money in that OWC place. You're stating all turns 2.19 TB or smaller will function with my older Gary the gadget guy4? And specifically I would get a FW one of program as I like the quickness. Also like the faster 7200 / 10,000 (did they possess any?) generates not the slower types to consider benefit of all that FW provides to provide. I'meters not doing this kind of main purchase decision every day time, remorseful to request, but I presume FW 800'h they show 2 slots of are both backwards compatible to FW 400 if that is certainly what my H4 provides?

I talk to again as I would daisy string the runs for that comparison program to make use of. And I have got experienced FW turns/scanners where one slot can be 400 one is usually 800 so it mattered (back then-years ago) which interface I utilized, so making specific its 400 in situation my H4 only offers two 400 slots not really one of éach as I generally presumed when not purchasing the products. I know I rambled. Making queries for each of the above so you can answer very easily: Q1. Any get on that web site/page /hyperlink you showed me that will be 2.19 or smaller will work?

I use and will be purchasing even more than one travel, so just being specific before spending in this direction that they will function with my 10.4 G4 Macintosh. I also like the faster FW study/write speeds, so I assume the FW 800'beds on this oné: (for example-l've not really shopped entire page/site yet) offers two FW 800 ports they point out as 400/800 will that mean backwards compatible to my 400 ports on G4? I recognize you pointed out in your remedy about wires that do the 400/800 upgrade/downgrade as I have got them on my 'pc', I was just checking out to notice if the explanation since it integrated the term 400, does that mean its immediately compatible without the cables? Q4. I assume both slots may become FW 400 on the Gary the gadget guy4 unless one is definitely 800 and one will be 400. So how does OWC 's very own range of HD (Newer Tech) evaluate with the large companies.

Like Seagate and Western Digital. I wear't would like to reduce my photos as they are only held on the HD not really the computer of course-computer just copies from the camcorder making use of iPhoto 09. (I understand they have guarantee, I wear't want a fresh one, just desire to understand their dependability of complete drive failing compares favorably with the others before assigning to a fresh company. (that is usually why I possess even more than one HD in situation one falters, the other has the pictures (exact same ones) on it simply because nicely, like RAID but carried out by hand in the case of this older Macintosh. (You understand I actually would wish Time Machine, but don't possess that one in 10.4!) Queen6.

I think I asked this very long back. I discovered something on OWC that has been stackable like Newer Tech (I wear't need the stacking so do not get that into accóunt)-but reviewers talked about that the runs did something humorous to their Bluetooth products, slicing them out and only found out this after they purchased it. Its why I remained away from everything ón OWC. To prevent obtaining the incorrect push. I have 3 Bluetooth products working on the Mac H4 at almost all moments. Keyboard/ actual physical Computer mouse w pad/ and of course the electronic camcorder can deliver photos to iPhoto ór any folder ón the Mac pc using Bluetooth connection. If the pushes put out disturbance EM indicators that disrupt this, after that I'm not really capable to make use of the runs.

Sorry for this difficult 1 to become last question. I attempted to find my earlier terms I thought I composed about this but has been unable to locate on my personal computer or right here. Thanks everyone ánd BD Aqua fór reading through it all again! Wish my report the questions produced my thoughts clearer as tó what I'michael inquiring. You're also stating all runs 2.19 TB or smaller sized will work with my previous Gary the gadget guy4? Assuming it has the proper slots for your G4.

Yes, as above. These should function,even mainly because far back again as Operating-system8.6!

That one may become a bit iffy would require. FW/400 is definitely 6 pin number oblong, FW/800 is 9 flag square. I'g say the instances chipsets utilized are significantly better than what HDD Manufacturers make use of, the HDD utilized is certainly the questionOWC't may have got different brand names. You can study the rankings there. That interference can be with USB3 forces only. You can also request on My Web site.

I'michael heading to state great work! Great solutions all of them, and tag it resolved here.

I nevertheless have more 'follow-up' questions. Since they will get a little bit of studying the appropriate links or take a photograph and publishing etc.

To obtain my point across so watch for a fresh thread (I'll web page link the fresh one back here) -you'll understand its related since its the only one I'll be posting but I'll also do it for long term customers of Apple Group to become great and useful. I'll furthermore consider you up on give to join your internet site. Really appears good. Issue 1: Can you suggest what components of what I already asked are still good to 're inquire' for that internet site as well? Or should I just cut and insert your and my whole posts so who ever connects to in on your web site knows what we discussed and responded to already?

Up to yóu, its your site! Question 2: Let me know if suitable to respond right here or wait until I publish there. Put on't would like to annoyed the guidelines of Apple company Local community in doing so. Just needed to reply sooner instead than afterwards to allow you understand I go through your answer back (Excellent pics.

Yes ! I have 800 FW on both Mac ports and both ports on each of my G-Drives (poor little full 500 GB ones each). Thanks a lot again! Hope they let me post after resolving it. A follow up informative item I uncovered and desired to write-up in any case. You said:: A5.

I'd say the instances chipsets used are much much better than what HDD Manufacturers make use of, the HDD used will be the questionOWC's i9000 may possess different manufacturers. You can study the ratings there. Right here can be what I discovered ( a bit older 2006 I notice): Douglas Griffin February 23, 2006 1:51 I am Re also: Exterior hard get recommendations in reaction to Vincent Tam Hi Vincent, This line appears to have got passed away except for the fact that I'm still subscribed to it.

No one particular ever noticed my own question. However, I did a little bit of analysis and pestering close friends after posting, and ended up going with a 600 Gig RAID, Mercury Elite-AL Professional FireWire 800/400 from Various other World Processing (. ) I can't actually compare to various other externals on a individual experience degree, but I had been told to move with Seagate commute on the inside of, which this provides.

Subsequent research and testimonials appeared to keep the advice out. Rate lab tests and feedback ón the OWC item and business are good as well. If you determine to buy from them, just be aware in that not every exterior of this model provides Seagate turns within. It vascilates back again and on from size to size, so learn the specs for each before you purchase. This suggestions might also apply to their some other drives simply because well. Desire I could become of more knowledgable assist, but, from my experience, this may be the only answer you obtain to this older thread.

Include no, I put on't work for the corporation.; - ) So its simply as you mentioned. Inside the situations can end up being a 'Seagate' HDD just as Douglas Griffin demonstrated above. What can be HGST???

So I checked. Its European Digital possessed! Head office HGST, a West Digital organization 3403 Yerba Buena Street San Jose, Ca 95135 So you like them? I started this search looking at Seagate Drives, which you state is definitely your 'final' choice. Treatment to proceed into fine detail?

(I'm still keying in up a longer answer like the two Seagate pushes I found on 'Staples ' Web site (therefore they are amazingly low priced likened to OWC's) that I has been recommended to get. Therefore if I understand why you are undesirable to them, maybe I'll neglect that part and blog post it without that a single as I certainly do not want turns that fall short me for storing pictures (remember I use two backup memory sticks or more so if one does not work out I have got the various other, but why danger failure if Seagate can be not as good as HGST types?-(Spoiler alert for my fresh thread here)-but again I have to track lower and show you whát WD and othérs mentioned about 10.4- ). Apple Footer. This web site includes user submitted content, responses and views and is for informational purposes just. Apple company may provide or recommend reactions as a feasible solution centered on the information offered; every potential problem may include several elements not complete in the discussions taken in an digital community forum and Apple can thus provide no assurance as to the efficacy of any proposed solutions on the area forums. Apple disclaims any and all liability for the acts, omissions and conduct of any 3rd celebrations in link with or associated to your use of the web site. All postings and use of the content on this web site are subject matter to the.